NEWS AND VIEWS

Accurate estimates of the biodiversity of soil animals are essential for conservation efforts and to understand the animals’ role in carbon cycles. Such information is now available on a global scale for nematode worms.

Nico Eisenhauer is at the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig , 04103 Leipzig, Germany, and at the Institute of Biology, Leipzig University.

Contact

Carlos A. Guerra is at the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig , 04103 Leipzig, Germany, and at the Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.

Climate change is affecting biodiversity and the functioning of ecosystems around the globe1. Soil organisms are a crucial component of terrestrial biodiversity, and aid human well-being by making contributions in areas such as food security, water purification and carbon storage2,3. However, there is uncertainty about how the dynamics of soil biodiversity will change in the future as a result of agricultural intensification and alterations in climate and land use4. This is alarming, given the substantial gaps in current knowledge about the global distribution of soil biodiversity5,6. Large, worldwide data sets of soil microorganisms and fungi are available, and these have been generated using DNA-based approaches7,8. However, no quantitative assessment of soil animals has been undertaken at the global scale. Writing in Nature, van den Hoogen et al.9 now fill this gap by presenting the most comprehensive data set of soil-dwelling nematode worms reported so far.

Nematode worms are tiny (no more than 10 millimetres in length), transparent roundworms that live in films of water in the soil10 (Fig. 1). They provide a useful subject for studying soil biodiversity because they are so common — their numbers can often exceed 1 million individuals per square metre of soil11. Nematodes represent approximately 80% of all the multicellular animals on Earth11,12, and they have major roles in many ecosystems. In some cases, they have a negative effect, for example some nematodes are plant pests that can cause devastating losses to global crop yields. By contrast, other types can boost plant growth by driving nutrient cycling10,12.

Nematode

Figure 1 | A nematode worm. Van den Hoogen et al.9 report a comprehensive data set that provides global maps of the abundance and types of soil-dwelling nematodes.Credit: Andy Murray

Van den Hoogen and colleagues assembled data on 6,759 soil samples taken from the top-soil layer of various ecosystems and all continents. The authors analysed the data to determine the numbers and types of nematode present (using microscopy, these groupings were made on the basis of the type of food eaten by a particular nematode, such as plants or fungi10,11). Soil nematode communities vary widely over small spatial scales, and this makes it difficult to use observations taken from a particular place to estimate the global nematode population. To overcome this problem, the authors used a machine-learning approach to analyse published and unpublished data to predict global nematode patterns and thereby generate global-level maps of nematode abundance and biomass. The authors estimate that 4.4 × 1020 nematodes inhabit the upper soil layer around the world, an incredibly large number that is comparable in scale to the estimated number of stars in the observable Universe.

Biodiversity for vertebrates, invertebrates and plants decreases from the Equator to the poles, and many possible mechanisms underlying this trend have been discussed13. By contrast, van den Hoogen and colleagues report the opposite pattern for nematodes: the highest abundance and biomass — indicators of biodiversity — occur in boreal forests (such as conifer forests in snowy landscapes) and tundra regions (cold plains that lack tree growth). This discovery thus challenges the current textbook view of the global distribution pattern of animal diversity. Instead, the authors’ data suggest that the global distribution patterns of soil animals are more similar to those of soil-dwelling microbes6,7.

Van den Hoogen and colleagues also present global estimates of the amount of carbon stored in nematode bodies, as well as estimates of nematode metabolic activity. The authors’ projections indicate that nematode metabolism emits the equivalent of 15% of the current carbon emissions from fossil fuels. This finding has important implications for our understanding of global carbon cycles and potential feedbacks that could affect climate change, given that, so far, soil animals have been neglected in carbon models.

The results presented by van den Hoogen and colleagues suggest that nematodes are abundant in parts of the world that are expected to undergo substantial climate change, such as boreal and tundra regions. The authors highlight the potential threats to these organisms and to the processes that they affect in a changing world. A warming climate might cause a decrease in nematode abundance that will have unknown feedback effects on the emissions of greenhouse gases from the soil and on other ecosystem processes, such as plant infection by pests. It will be essential to gain further insight into the factors influencing other soil animals, such as ants and earthworms, that modulate the environment for smaller organisms, including nematodes2. Addressing this will require comprehensive, global sampling and monitoring over time14.

Although current developments, including this study by van den Hoogen and colleagues, and other studies7,8, shed light on the state, processes and functions of soil biodiversity, such data might not elucidate the consequences of current and projected global changes. Therefore, beyond plotting global maps of soil biodiversity, it will be essential to understand the direct and indirect effects that factors driving global change will have on soil communities and ecosystems in the future. It will also be important to know whether these effects vary across different types of ecosystem, soil conditions and land-management approach. An improved understanding of the dynamics of soil biodiversity could provide researchers and policymakers with the knowledge needed to determine how vulnerable the animals in soil communities are, and thus enable the development of effective conservation strategies for soil biodiversity6.

Advances in the past few decades have led to the development of predictive computer models that can be used to better inform policy decisions15. Many current policy and strategic documents already include some form of predictive modelling for making informed projections of possible ecological, environmental, social and economic futures16. Yet in most large-scale projections relevant to ecology or sustainability, the role of soils and soil communities has been absent. For example, the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, which is part of the United Nations, produced a global report on the threats to and trends in biodiversity that did not include a single mention of soil-dwelling organisms in the overview summary section1, and only a few scattered mentions of these organisms in the main document. It would therefore clearly be valuable to have more information about the expected dynamics of soil biodiversity under scenarios of global change.

In the context of international efforts to tackle climate change, such as the Paris agreement17, and considering the failure to achieve the 2020 biodiversity goals known as the Aichi targets18, having one of the most dominant parts of terrestrial diversity absent from scientific and political discourse will probably only contribute to the deterioration of soil biodiversity, with unforeseeable consequences for ecosystem sustainability. This issue is even more crucial, considering that initiatives such as the push for global forest restoration19 might result in substantial changes to the nematode communities in the Northern Hemisphere. Van den Hoogen and colleagues’ work is an urgently needed step in the right direction, and provides a foundation on which to develop a deeper understanding of future terrestrial ecosystems.

Nature 572, 187-188 (2019)

doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02197-0

References

  1. 1.

    Díaz, S. et al. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019).

    • 2.

      Bardgett, R. D. & van der Putten, W. H. Nature 515, 505–511 (2014).

    • 3.

      Wall, D. H., Nielsen, U. N. & Six, J. Nature 528, 69–76 (2015).

    • 4.

      Veresoglou, S. D., Halley, J. M. & Rillig, M. C. Nature Commun. 6, 8862 (2015).

    • 5.

      Cameron, E. K. et al. Nature Ecol. Evol. 2, 1042–1043 (2018).

    • 6.

      Cameron, E. K. et al. Conserv. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13311 (2019).

    • 7.

      Tedersoo, L. et al. Science 346, 1256688 (2014).

    • 8.

      Ramirez, K. S. et al. Nature Microbiol. 3, 189–196 (2017).

    • 9.

      van den Hoogen, J. et al. Nature 572, 194–198 (2019).

    • 10.

      Orgiazzi, A. et al. Global Soil Biodiversity Atlas (EC, 2016).

      • 11.

        Bongers, T. & Bongers, M. Appl. Soil Ecol. 10, 239–251 (1998).

      • 12.

        Yeates, G. W. J. Nematol. 11, 213–229 (1979).

      • 13.

        Gaston, K. J. Nature 405, 220–227 (2000).

      • 14.

        Eisenhauer, N., Bonn, A. & Guerra, C. A. Nature Commun. 10, 50 (2019).

      • 15.

        Araújo, M. B. et al. Sci. Adv. 5, eaat4858 (2019).

      • 16.

        Thuiller, W., Guéguen, M., Renaud, J., Karger, D. N. & Zimmermann, N. E. Nature Commun. 10, 1446 (2019).

      • 17.

        Guiot, J. & Cramer, W. Science 354, 465–468 (2016).

      • 18.

        Tittensor, D. P. et al. Science 346, 241–244 (2014).

      • 19.

        Bastin, J.-F. et al. Science 365, 76–79 (2019).

      Download references